|
:''You may be looking for Philip Huntoon'' Philip Hunton (c.1600-1682) was an English clergyman and political writer, known for his May 1643 anti-absolutist work ''A Treatise of Monarchy''. It became a banned book under the Restoration.〔(England )〕 ==A Treatise of Monarchie (1643)== At the time of publication, it provoked a much better-known rebuttal, the 1648 ''Anarchy of a Limited and Mixed Monarchy'' by Robert Filmer. It was part of a pamphleteering exchange initiated by the royal chaplain Henry Ferne. Hunton was among the few who attempted to chart a 'middle course' between the royalists and the Long parliamentarians. In his ''Treatise'', he cites both Charles Herle (a Parliamentary supporter) and royalist Henry Ferne (against whom much of the ''Treatise'' was directed). This was though only to contradict both, and chart a new position. He outlined a theory of active/passive obedience, and active/passive resistance, arguing that, unless the defense of the ''whole'' community is at stake, it is unlawful to actively/violently resist the most tyrannous and unlawful actions of the ruler.〔Christopher Hill, ''Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution'' (1965) p. 282: ''Philip Hunton (Provost of Durham College), the Levellers, Milton, and William Dell all quoted the Dutch Revolt as an example establishing the right of resistance in the name of nature and reason.''〕 According to William Haller,〔''The Rise of Puritanism'' (1938), p. 365.〕 Hunton Christopher Hill, however, calls him a "representative thinker".〔''Puritanism and Revolution'' (1958), p. 77 of Penguin edition.〕 His is among the few major works of the period to provide a holistic theory of the balance of powers. While other writers would make the case for Parliament in the present circumstances,〔Hill, ''The Century of Revolution'' (1961), p. 155 of 1978 edition: ''...as the war proceeded, political thinkers like Prynne, Hunton, Parker, slowly worked out a theory of Parliamentary sovereignty.''〕 and as to why Parliament should be considered supreme (indeed, Herle admits, for example, that the realm was arbitrarily subject to Parliament), Hunton argued that no power in a 'mixed government' could be supreme, and all the powers were coordinate. Indeed, it was best to be 'undecided' about the relative strength of the powers, rather than to try and enforce the supremacy of one, as that would alter the structure of government. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Philip Hunton」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|